Conclusion

Virtualization should never be seen as a simple solution to a specific problem; that is the main idea we have been trying to convey. It is a principle, a technology that is applicable in a very large range of different solutions. It is also a buzzword to get cash flowing nowadays, and is heralded by a lot of companies as "the next best thing in IT".

The purpose of this article is to make clear that we believe the current wave of virtualization will in fact make very big changes in datacenters as we know them, but also that it is not some new "holy grail of IT" and has always been a part of it in some way. It's important not to get carried away by all the recent hype surrounding the subject, but to understand each technology's purpose and how to make use of them in the most efficient way possible.

We hope our series of articles has helped or will help those readers who are looking into really understanding what virtualization is all about, giving them a solid base to fall back on in future decisions. It has certainly been a very interesting couple of months at our lab - learning and teaching about virtualization - and we don't doubt many more interesting virtualization technologies will grab our interest. Having spent quite some time focusing on the business side of virtualization, though, it will be interesting to check out the ways it is applicable in desktop situations, so look forward to either some blogs or an article on that in the future!

Some Fun Virtualization Feats for Desktop Users
Comments Locked

14 Comments

View All Comments

  • FATCamaro - Tuesday, October 28, 2008 - link

    I wasn't clear on how the different hypervisor products compared (ESX, Xen, MS?) with respect to binary translation or paravirtualization without looking at your other article. A summary here would have been nice.
  • MontagGG - Tuesday, October 28, 2008 - link

    You should be able to run a virtual Win98 in Vista to play classic games. This does require the premium editions.
  • murphyslabrat - Tuesday, October 28, 2008 - link

    You seemed to have addressed the issue in the end, but my question is: as far as PC Gaming goes, is there any reason to use a virtual machine. If the answer is yes, then which approach is typically best, and what would be the recommendation for software.
  • Denithor - Tuesday, October 28, 2008 - link

    Read page 11 of the article.

    Yes, in certain cases. If you're running OS X or Linux you can run a virtual copy of XP which can then run a game not supported by your "true" operating system. However, it's going to add overhead, therefore reducing performance (game speaks to the virtual XP which has to speak to the real OS which talks to the hardware). Newer games probably won't work very well because they need as much hardware as they can get so the extra baggage will just weigh them down.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now